|
Commonwealth
Accountability Testing System |
|
|
School Report
Card |
|
|
|
|
|
1999-2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Camargo
Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Duff 4307 Camargo Road Mt Sterling, KY
40353 - (859)-497-8776 (859)-497-8755 MDuff@montgomery.k12.ky.us |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear
Parents/Guardians: This report card provides information about how
well our school is doing, where it is succeeding, and where there is room for
improvement. While it cannot tell everything about our performance, the
report card is a good starting point for discussions with our teachers,
administrators, school council members, and school board members. Unless
noted, all data is from the 1999-2000 school year; contact information and
narratives reflect the most recent school year's activity. For a more
detailed examination of our school, please ask to see our Expanded Report
Card, which contains a wealth of data and reports detailing school
performance and procedures. Each school is required by law to provide this
information upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
About Our School |
|
|
|
|
|
The mission of Camargo Elementary School is to
actively search for and discover the talents and intellectual abilities of
each student and to provide a learning environment that will encourage all
students to develop to their full potential. We, the staff, students, parents, district
personnel, and community of Camargo Elementary School accept the
responsibility of working cooperatively to ensure that all students master
the learner outcomes to the best of their ability. Camargo Elementary School is located in a rural
section in the southern end of the county. The community of Camargo is a
closely knit community whose citizens care about education. Our students come from not only this
community but extends to the Powell, Menifee and Bath County lines. |
|
|
|
|
|
How Our School Ensures
Educational Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
To help our struggling learners, we employ 4 1/2
Special Education teachers, 4 3/4 Title I Reading Teachers, and one Title I Math/Science Resource Teacher.
We have a 1/4 time Gifted/ Talented teacher to serve our G/T students. Our
school addresses equity as a separate component in our Consolidated Plan. Our
school addresses equity as a separate component in our Consolidated Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
School Enrollment __639___ |
|
How Our Students Perform |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kentucky uses the Commonwealth Accountability
Testing System (CATS) to hold schools accountable for student progress. CATS
has three parts: the Kentucky Core Content Tests, the national Comprehensive
Test of Basic Skills (CTBS/5), and other measures of the school’s
performance, including attendance, retention and dropout rates. Together
these three elements make up a school’s CATS Performance Score for every
two-year period. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kentucky Core Content Tests
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
These tests measure the ability of our students to
use knowledge in each subject. Kentucky’s tests rate student performance
using four categories: Novice, Apprentice, Proficient, and Distinguished.
These categories translate into a scale of 0-140, with 100 being considered
proficient. The state goal for all schools is 100 by the year 2014. This
chart compares our school's performance, including academic indices and the
percent of our students scoring novice, apprentice, proficient and
distinguished (P/D), with all the schools in our district and all the schools
in Kentucky. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
KCCT Test |
Novice |
Apprentice |
Proficient/Distinguished |
|
Academic Index |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
School |
District |
State |
School |
District |
State |
School |
District |
State |
|
School |
District |
State |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Reading (4th) |
4% |
2% |
3% |
79% |
58% |
65% |
16% |
40% |
32% |
|
71.7 |
81.2 |
76.9 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Science (4th) |
13% |
8% |
12% |
85% |
87% |
82% |
2% |
6% |
6% |
|
51 |
59 |
56.9 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Writing (4th) |
46% |
33% |
30% |
41% |
47% |
50% |
13% |
20% |
20% |
|
43.8 |
53.1 |
54.2 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Mathematics (5th) |
15% |
12% |
21% |
66% |
63% |
54% |
19% |
25% |
25% |
|
66.7 |
71.9 |
67.1 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Social Studies (5th) |
8% |
8% |
20% |
82% |
80% |
67% |
10% |
12% |
13% |
|
61 |
62.3 |
57.9 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Arts & Humanities (5th) |
77% |
69% |
65% |
19% |
26% |
31% |
4% |
5% |
5% |
|
25.9 |
31.3 |
32.5 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
PL/VS (5th) |
35% |
34% |
38% |
60% |
60% |
55% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
|
45.7 |
46.4 |
45 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
The goal is that by 2014
nearly all students will score proficient or distinguished. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
National Norm Referenced Test
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The national norm referenced test used in
Kentucky, the CTBS/5, measures the basic skills of our students while
allowing us to compare their performance with national benchmarks established
in 1996. These scores are reported in percentiles. A percentile shows the
percentage of students who fell below a particular score on the test. For
example, a percentile of 60 would show that the average student in our school
scored equal to or better than 60 percent of all students who took the test.
For data on student performance on the ACT, SAT, and advanced placement
tests, ask to see our school’s Expanded Report Card. |
National Norm Referenced Test (CTBS/5) |
School |
District |
State |
Nation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
End of Primary (EOP) Reading |
50%ile |
63%ile |
55%ile |
50%ile |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EOP Language Arts |
43%ile |
56%ile |
53%ile |
50%ile |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EOP Mathematics |
40%ile |
61%ile |
55%ile |
50%ile |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Measures
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other measures of school performance are the
degree to which our school succeeds in getting students to come to school,
our dropout rate, and the degree to which our graduates successfully move on
to higher education or jobs. Another measure is the retention rate, which
reflects the percent of students who were not academically ready to go on to
the next grade and had to repeat the content of a grade for another year.
These data reflect our performance during the 1998-1999 school year. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Attendance Rate |
Retention Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
School |
94.3% |
12.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
District |
94.4% |
5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
State |
93.9% |
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our
CATS Performance
|
State Contest Results: Academic/Speech, Band, Chorus, and Orchestra
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starting in
the year 2002, this space will contain a customized
growth chart showing our school’s academic improvement annually in relation
to the goal of proficiency by the year 2014. |
We are a member | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||