Kentucky Department of Education

 

Transactive Writing

Last Updated on Tuesday, March 06, 2007 at 5:17 AM

An analysis of the characteristics of transactive writing required in the portfolio, i.e., writing from an informed writer to a less informed reader

Kentucky writing documents download page.

Transactive writing involves both the writer and the reader.  The writer initiates the action and expects a reaction from the reader, hence the name "transactive."  This action can take different forms:  to inform, to persuade, to defend, to move to action, to sell, etc.  The reader's reaction, then, depends on the purpose of the writing.  He may be convinced to do something, to look at something in a new way, to see things the way the writer sees them, etc. 

 

In the classroom, then, transactive writing

•  has a focused purpose, an authentic reason for being written besides completing an assignment

•  provides a context or reason for giving the information that follows

•  moves the reader through the piece with logical organization and appropriate transitional strategies

•  leaves the reader with something to think about at the end

 

Since transactive writing takes real-world forms, teachers should provide students with models of writing actually done in their content areas.  The following list is by no means intended to be exclusive but merely ideas upon which teachers can build.

 

business letter

proposal

review

commentary

handbook

editorial writing

letter to editor

pamphlet

interview

fitness plan

written speech

brochure

manual

booklet

guide

consumer information

lab report for inquiry lab

cost analysis

academic journal article

feature article

instructions

memo

accident report

case study

 

Do the purposes allow/ encourage the student to use higher order thinking and to connect content to real life?

 

What real-world forms of writing do you see? 

 

What real-world audiences are students writing to? 

 

What strategies do the writers use to develop their ideas? 

 

Are assignments real-world and authentic or "cookie cutter" ones, based on artificial scenarios?

 

Do students appear to have some choice (decision-making) in the content, purpose, etc.?

 

What common problems or concerns do you see overall in the content pieces?

For more information contact:

Cindy Parker
500 Mero Street, 19th floor CPT
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502-564-2106
Cindy.Parker@education.ky.gov